
A novel for fans of walking, looking through cupboards and lying down. It’s a Pulitzer prize winner from 2007 and widely acclaimed by jerks that you work with, or see on the bus, or wherever it is that you interact with other humans, as being tremendous and was even made into a successfully dull movie.
The truth: it sucks.

Journey alongside an unnamed father and son who basically walk around the place looking for warmth and sustenance and avoiding bad guys who are made up of cannibals, thieves and murderers. Enjoy the detailed descriptions of both male humans eating canned goods they scrounge for amongst the ruins of civilisation. Bask in your own emotional stability as you read about a suicidal man reliving the suicide of his wife as he contemplates murdering his defenceless and presumably innocent child with a firearm. Immerse yourself in the pointless details of a child’s whining to his father about the wonderful life that he can’t have while the father does his best impression of your own dead-beat dad but offering nothing but excuses. Deal with the logical flaws arising from the practical scientific difficulties with keeping captive people in a basement and somehow managing to amputate their limbs systematically yet then manage to stich up their gaping wounds and prevent enough blood loss and ward off the inevitable risk of infection without the assistance of medical implements or medication, not to mention somehow treating the dramatic symptoms of shock and pain associated with the hacking of body parts, so that they can keep their meat-donors alive as a little hidden nest of human food in their convenient underground larder.
On top of all that, the book is ARTISTIC. The author eschews quotation marks in conversation and selectively dismisses apostrophes because we need to know that things are just that little bit different. He writes in annoying, halting half-sentences, much like this particular review now that I think about it, when he repeatedly describes just how gray, dull and lifeless everything is.
And to cap it all off, the climax of this orgy of boring misery is the sight of a father abandoning his child (yeah, yeah, the dad died, but he gave up on life a hell of a lot easier than those crazy mothers with superhuman strength who can lift cars off their crushed infants) and the kid is immediately collected by a marauding group of paedophiles where he is led away to his almost certain sexual degradation followed by a painful death by way of torture and cannibalistic consumption.
Such a feel good experience that it can only be made worse by Oprah’s endorsement, a certain kiss-of-death.
This is a boring book for boring people. There is barely a plot, no character development and if you learnt any kind of moral lesson or gained any kind of insight whatsoever from reading it then you must have been starting from scratch. You can disagree with me in the comments section below and I will do my best to insult all-comers for arguing with me.
Re: The Road
I saw the movie because it was a post-apocalyptic film. Like I probably saw it on some IMDB list.
I agree with everything you've said. The movie sucks. It creates a half decent world and even some really good themes and then it does NOTHING with it. Fuck.
It's not good, it's the kind of shit aimed at Oprah fans and obviously they lap it up because it's the rare depressing thing they'll see in their live to counteract the overly hysterical 'inspirational' crap they lap up.
Re: The Road
I love The Road.
Re: The Road
The Hordes, nice work on getting some solid group-think going here.
Luke McQ, what do you like about the book / movie? When you really stop and think about it, I think you'll find that my logic in the above discussion is FLAWLESS.
Re: The Road
The movie was terrible.
I loved the book, however I can also agree with most things said in this review, haha.
Re: The Road
I liked the movie.
Couldn't get past page 10 of the book.
Re: The Road
I disagree about the 'specialness' of non quotation marks for dialogue... I've read other books like this, and I'm pretty sure Cormac McCarthy does this with his other books as well.
I found the book to be an intense but easy read.
I found the film to be a good adaptation.
Re: The Road
I dont know about this review...
I think Bryce Courtenay is a pretty powerful writer. Maybe it was a bit subtle but I enjoyed the cameos
Re: The Road
I agree pat, the deus ex machina at the end was crap and the language was mind-numbing
Re: The Road
Gee you love bringing that up critch. Are you referring to the family happening by?
Re: The Road
Yes that's what I was referring to. The fact that in a supposed world full of starving baby spit-roasting cannibals the first adult to come along is seemingly gonna save him, it was bullshit. The kid blowing his brains out would've made the bleakness of the rest of the book more satisfying (except for Oprah's book of the week lemmings, they needed a teary eyed, upliftng ending).
A deus ex machina ( /ˈdeɪ.əs ɛks ˈmɑːkiːnə/ or /ˈdiːəs ɛks ˈmækɨnə/ day-əs eks mah-kee-nə;[1] Latin: "god out of the machine"; plural: dei ex machina) is a plot device whereby a seemingly inextricable problem is suddenly and abruptly solved with the contrived and unexpected intervention of some new event, character, ability, or object.
Couldn't be more appropriate
Re: The Road
I know what a deus ex machin is. I just don't think it's the worst example of it.
However it is definitely a shit way to end the movie.